patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Prosecutor: No Charges in Deadly Stand Your Ground Shooting

Prosecutors will not file charges against security guard Seth Browning, who shot and killed Brandon Baker, 30, of Palm Harbor. Documents obtained by Palm Harbor Patch reveal that Baker had cocaine and alcohol in his system when he attacked Browning.

 
0 of 0
Brandon Baker, 30, was shot and killed March 6 during a confrontation with an off-duty security guard.
Photos (16)

Photos

Prosecutors say they will not file charges against off-duty security guard Seth Browning, 23, in connection with the deadly roadside shooting of a Palm Harbor man last March.

Back in April, the State Attorney's Office opened an investigation into the death of Brandon Baker, 30, who was shot and killed around 2 a.m. March 6, on the road leading to his Boot Ranch apartment complex. Browning and Baker had pulled over after having an interaction while driving their vehicles on East Lake Road. Browning told investigators he shot Baker after Baker approached him in an aggressive manner. Baker's family wanted Browning arrested and charged in connection with the shooting.

The State Attorney's Office filed paperwork Monday morning that ended its four month-long investigation into the case.

"We are not filing charges," Assistant State Attorney Bill Loughery told Palm Harbor Patch.

"The bottom line is, this was justifiable use of deadly force. ... It's a rather long and involved investigation," he said.

Monday morning, Palm Harbor Patch obtained the nine-page memo that Loughery sent to Pinellas-Pasco State Attorney Bernie McCabe.

Memo Reveals New Details

The memo revealed new details about the case, including what happened prior to the deadly exchange. Brandon Baker, his girlfriend Amy Marcellus, 35, and Brandon's twin brother, Christopher Baker, had been drinking at a bar in Hudson. They left around 2 a.m. to go home to the apartment they shared at Egret Landing Apartments in East Lake's Boot Ranch community.

They stopped at a 7-Eleven to get gas. Brandon and Amy got into an argument that left Amy crying and upset, according to the memo. The group then continued on their way to the apartment, driving south on East Lake Road.

What Seth Browning Told Investigators

The memo explained Seth Browning's version of what happened:

"Seth Browning stated that after Brandon Baker passed him driving erratically, he pulled beside him to see if the driver (Brandon Baker) was all right. Seth Browning said he gave Brandon Baker a 'thumbs up' sign which Brandon Baker acknowledged with a wave of his hand that Seth Browning interpreted as 'follow me.' This happened at the Boot Ranch Road turn and Seth Browning, with little reflection, followed … 

"It is unfortunate that Seth Browning chose to follow Brandon Baker as he turned onto Boot Ranch Road, but there is nothing improper or illegal in his doing so. The brief interaction on East Lake Road, as described by Seth Browning, does not suggest a road rage scenario whereby Seth Browning would reasonably believe he was creating or joining a confrontation.

"Per Seth Browning, his motivation to follow Brandon Baker was based on attempting to get his tag number (due to erratic driving) and his curiosity which is not controverted by any other evidence. Based upon Brandon Baker's level of intoxication, it appears highly likely Brandon Baker was driving erratically, and the getting of his tag number was the reasonable actions of a concerned citizen.

"After stopping, Seth Browning repeatedly stated he was not expecting any type of hostile confrontation. Brandon Baker came to his open car window 'extremely offensive.' Seth Browning was distracted by Christopher Baker stopping behind him. Brandon Baker began striking Seth Browning inside Seth Browning's Lancer. Seth Browning pepper-sprayed Brandon in defense of himself. Brandon Baker continued to strike Seth Browning after the spray. The second person (Christopher Baker) was quickly approaching and Seth Browning's fear increased.

"Seth Browning believed the pepper spray emptied and Brandon Baker continued to attack him so he felt he 'had to end it' so he retrieved his firearm from the glove box, racked it and fired one shot into Brandon Baker as Brandon Baker was hitting him through his window. Brandon Baker staggered back from the window and Seth Browning felt the threat was over ... Seth Browning stated he stepped out of his car in a defensive stance after the shooting, and when he did so, he forgot his car was in drive, and it rolled forward, striking the back of Brandon Baker's truck. The minor collision is confirmed by physical evidence at the scene. This is important because it arguably demonstrates that Seth Browning wasn't lying in wait for Brandon Baker."

Other details in the memo:

  • "Both Christopher Baker and Amy Marcellus indicated that Brandon Baker had approximately three drinks that evening. They also indicated that they never saw him use any drugs. In fact, the toxicology report showed the Brandon Baker was under the influence of both alcohol and cocaine. His blood alcohol level was .166 medical blood, clearly inconsistent with the number of drinks they stated he consumed. Assuming the time frame they indicated he was drinking, according to accepted alcohol analysis software used to calculate blood alcohol content, Brandon Baker would have to have ingested 8-10 more drinks than what they said. Also, he had cocaine in his system that was still active. According to the Medical Examiner, the amount of cocaine in Brandon Baker's system would be consistent with someone who had done a significant amount of cocaine earlier in the evening."
  • "Brandon Baker's level of intoxication, from both alcohol and cocaine, makes it reasonable to conclude that Seth Browning's description of Brandon Baker's aggression is plausible. Additionally, Brandon Baker had just minutes before been involved in an emotional argument with Amy Marcellus and was angry prior to crossing paths with Seth Browning."
  • "The autopsy shows that Brandon Baker was killed by a single gunshot to the left chest area, toward the armpit. ... Dr. Thogmartin's opinion was that the firearm was one to two inches from Brandon Baker when fired. The FDLE's analysis of Brandon Baker's shirt concluded that the gun was fired contact/near contact. Knowing that Seth Browning was sitting in his car, this evidence shows that Brandon Baker was bent over with his left arm up, consistent with Seth Browning describing Brandon Baker as leaning into his car, striking him."
  • "In conclusion, based upon the quickly unfolding circumstances, Seth Browning was the victim of a burglary/battery (statutorily defined as a forcible felony), when Brandon Baker attacked Seth Browning as he sat in his vehicle. Seth Browning attempted to use non-deadly force when he pepper-sprayed Brandon Baker in response. This non-deadly force did not deter Brandon Baker's violence. The applicable law, colloquially referred to as "Stand Your Ground," presumes that Seth Browning had a reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm. This law also presumes that Brandon Baker entered Seth Browning's vehicle with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence. (Jury instructions attached). Seth Browning had no legal duty to retreat before using the deadly force; which factually did not appear to be an option ... Seth Browning's statements are corroborated by the physical evidence and under these circumstances, Seth Browning's killing of Brandon Baker was a justifiable use of deadly force."
  • "My recommendation is that no criminal charges be filed as they could not be legally sustained. The evidence conclusively proves that Seth Browning would successfully assert the defense of justifiable use of deadly force."

Brandon Baker's father, Kevin Lindsay, has not yet responded to phone calls and an email sent last Friday about the decision.

Previous Coverage-

Related Topics: Boot Ranch, Brandon Baker, Christopher Baker, Deadly, Palm Harbor, Seth Browning, Shooting, and Stand Your Ground Law

Ed Shultz

6:19 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012

Looking forward to the civil trial.
Growing couldn't roll up his window?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rugeirn Drienborough

9:57 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

I suggest you experiment with trying to roll up your window while some big guy leans into your car through it beating on you. You may find it's a tad bit tricky.

Ed Shultz

6:30 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012

Pinellas Prosecutors are idiots!
They will waste millions on domestic violence issues.
But walk away from a easy murder conviction?This is a judges decision. NOT THE TOWN DRUNK!!!
Here hear for the town drunk Bernie "when's happy hour" McCabe and his village idiot minion bill l
A sad day for justice.w

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason Defant

9:19 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

I'm thankful for Seth Browning doing his part to try and get drunk drivers off the road. It's sad someone had to die, but the facts of the case were pretty clear to those that know ALL the facts. This was far from an easy murder conviction because it was CLEARLY self defense. Way to go Seth. We're happy you're FREE and CLEAR.

DON'T DRIVE DRUNK! and you won't have these issues!

Comment_arrow

Rugeirn Drienborough

10:00 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

If you pump yourself up on cocaine and booze - the tested levels of alcohol and cocaine in Baker's blood greatly exceed intoxication - and then go leaning into cars and beating on people, you just might find yourself on the receiving end of your victim's effort to resist you. Which can be fatal, as it was here. The law permits us all to defend ourselves.

Paul Allen

8:40 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

I guess you don't physically attack people if you don't want to get shot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason Defant

9:22 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Absolutely Paul. Too many people think they know this case from what garbage was printed in the media. Don't drive drunk, and don't use your bud muscles. The Baker boys had multiple opportunities to handle themselves differently. It's a shame they thought that attacking Seth Browning was the proper response. I'm just glad no one else got killed on the road while they were driving home drunk.

Michael Minyard

12:16 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Where is the baker family on this message board now? I asked back in May was Brandon intoxicated? Well here we are in September and we have found out he was drunk and high on coke. He thought he was hard and tried to attack Seth and got delt with and thats that! Of course there shouldnt be any charges here! Thankfully no innocent people where out there that night that got hurt before Seth took care of this felon who indangered other peoples lives!

Reply
Comment_arrow

brandi baker

8:43 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Are you really so full of Hatred that you need me to talk to you. Here I am still full of love for my brother and saddened by all this hatred.

Comment_arrow

Jason Defant

8:47 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

To Brandi - perhaps you should have paid closer attention to your brother's alcohol and drug use. Perhaps a loving sister could have convinced their brother that driving drunk and on cocaine is a recipe for disaster.

Comment_arrow

brandi baker

8:49 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I'm guessing you don't know a single person that's ever had a dui or got behind the wheel after parting. Did they deserve to die. I wish Brandon never got out of the car but I doubt he was beating seth up. Brandon was a big boy and seth had no bruises, broken nose nothing. Brandon wasn't a fighter anyways. I know you would like Brandon if you had a chance to meet him. If you can find 1 person that didn't like him I will be shocked. Go to the bank, cell phone store, grocery, his appt. complex, his old jobs, schools any where you will see how funny and loving he was.

Comment_arrow

Jason Defant

8:59 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Sorry Brandi - If someone drives DRUNK and HIGH ON COCAINE, then yes, I would expect that person to have a high probability to die that night. It's unfortunate that people have no sense and don't think about the potential danger to others when they get in that speeding bullet all hopped on on coke and booze. I'm not denying that this should have played out another way, but given your brother was driving DRUNK AND HIGH ON COCAINE means he probably did it before (if not frequently). When you drive under these conditions, your probability of getting into an accident, dying, or causing injury to someone else escalates tremendously. It's a shame your brothers and brother's girlfriend had absolutely no sense to call a cab rather than put all 3 of their lives at risk, as well as EVERY OTHER PERSON driving anywhere near them. No sympathy for Drunk and Drugged up Drivers whatsoever.

Comment_arrow

Concerned_Citizen

10:38 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

If you think that drunk driving should be punishable by death then you should move to some third world country it is. In America we do not kill everyone that makes a mistake. BTW, SETH BROWNING followed Brandon Baker into his apartment complex? Does that mean nothing in this case? If he felt threatened or felt he was in danger or didn't have a loaded gun on his lap ready to fire at an unarmed "drunk" man I highly doubt he would have followed Brandon Baker into Baker's apartment complex. Absolutely ridiculous. Not to mention Seth had changed his story a number of times.

Comment_arrow

Jason Defant

11:17 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Concerned Citizen - if you think that driving drunk is a mistake, you're are mistaken. It is far from a mistake. It's a choice that one takes, knowing that is it both dangerous and illegal. Add in being HIGH ON A LARGE AMOUNT OF COCAINE and it makes it even worse. And as I've said in many of my comments, no, I don't think that anyone should have died, however, when YOU DRIVE DRUNK AND HIGH ON COCAINE, you put yourself as RISK! PERIOD! Had this guy not been DRIVING DRUNK AND HIGH ON COCAINE this would not have happened. I hope you're not out driving drunk and high because you think it's OK. It's NOT! EVER! Call a damn cab or a friend and be responsible and you won't put yourself at risk for serious injury or worse, death. Many of the facts of this case are not even relevant when you look at the precursors. DRIVING DRUNK AND HIGH ON COCAINE is not a mistake, it is a conscious decision to put yourself at risk and others at risk. Not a cool choice to make. It's a shame more parents don't instill this in their children early on when they first start driving. We'd have many less DUIs and deaths on the road. It's unfortunate how this ended, but as I've said before, this guy could have easily driven into a pole and died that night, or worse, killed somebody else with his reckless attitude and driving!

nancy scaggs

1:53 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

One innocent person did get hurt...Seth Browning's reputation and the stress that this put on him and his family. The Baker's website time & time again slandered Seth Browning. They stalked the Browning family, making them go into hiding. The Baker's hatred & malicousness towards Seth was unacceptable and the lied that they swore to were false. Too bad that this will clear only his name and not the harm that the slanderious remarks that haunted them. Congrats on being cleared, Seth. We never doubted you for one minute.
And YES, I AM related to Seth Browning!

Reply
Comment_arrow

brandi baker

8:53 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012

We never ever stalked your family. I have no hatred!!!!!! All love for my brother. Never did anything to your family. Your family toke my brother away.

Comment_arrow

Dale

6:30 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Do you understand someone is dead here! Seth needs to accept a little responsability for following someone home. Period.

Mark

2:59 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

For those reading these comments for the first time connected to this article….I want to initially state that I have no (whatsoever) ties or relations, to any parties involved. I have followed this case since day one and I am simply a working citizen of Pinellas County with opinions as we all have……..It is pleasant to hear the justice workers in our county, took the necessary time to diligently investigate through all the evidence pertaining to this particular case, resulting in the clear and accurate final judgment. It is difficult for me to refrain from expressing several opinions I possess, in relation to the Baker family’s actions that led up to this final judgment. I can’t imagine how difficult it would be in attempting to not only cope with their loved one’s death, but also attempting to protect their loved one’s name and character. I get it. Yet, perhaps they can learn from Mr. Browning’s actions, while the case was still under investigation. I understand it is much easier to be said, than it is to follow through with, yet sucking up your pride and biting your lips during this process, would have been in the best interest for Brandon’s sake. Attempting to refute opinions (numerous turned out to be facts) with bold lies and/or slandering attacks on our county officials and what appears to be an upstanding citizen, is simply classless and disappointing.

Reply

Mark

3:00 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

. In addition, Mr. Ed Shultz, I’m assuming you’re an orthodox Mormon whom has never been seen sipping a cold one, during happy hour? Or were you one of the numerous ‘tanked’ at Mr. Baker’s ‘benefit concert’? Perhaps you need to “slow your roll” because your statement regarding the reasons Mr. Browning simply didn’t “roll his window up” is as ludicrous as your desperate, frivolous accusations. Regarding the civil case…….I understand the burden of proof requires the plaintiff to convince the judge or jury, thus is a change from the criminal case. However, it is difficult for me to believe, any other right-minded individual(s) will determine a different ending result, than the one we just received by the State. If anything, Mr. Browning has more of a ‘case’ to pursue civil action, than does the Baker family. The Baker family should be grateful of Seth’s behaviors after the unfortunate incident, in addition to be fortunate that Brandon’s brother was not (yet) criminally charged. Hopefully all parties will learn from this unfortunate tragedy and be able to move on with their lives in a productive manner, without future vindictive actions.

Reply

Justice Forall

10:08 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

I have been warped into Idiotville!! Have you all gone mad?? This man pursued a drunk driver and then shot him to death~ that's why when you call 911 you should let the proper authorities handle it. If he would have stepped aside and waited for the authorities to respond I don't think this young man would have been shot but rather properly arrested and having to face charges on driving under the influence. This case is similar to a Neighborhood watch situation, I wonder if it will have the same outcome? I'm not a lawyer or a judge but I don't believe DUI holds a death penalty!

Reply

Justice Forall

10:15 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

I agree with the "stand your ground" law but I'm not sure if you should be able to pursue and instigate someone and then claim self defense. I'm sure this case is going to be referred to in courtrooms across the country~ welcome to the new world of Vigilante Citizens and the fine line between legal and illegal!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul Allen

9:47 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Blah blah blah... You don't reach into someone else's car and assault them!

Concerned_Citizen

9:59 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

I'm so saddened to hear that this murderer will go free. I know it makes me feel less safe in the community. Seth Browning's story had changed from time to time about why he pulled over. On his 911 call all he did was curse and reflect how this is horrible for him, not for the dead man on the road that he just shot for no reason. There is something missing in this case. Still makes no sense why follow someone drunk driving to their home in a foreign place to you at 2 am in the morning. Very sad. The timelines don't add up. I just find it doubtful that the murderer Browning would have even followed had he not had a loaded weapon in his lap. Tragic. I pray for the Baker family that they may be able to move on someday.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason Defant

10:05 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

So you feel safe with idiots driving drunk and high on cocaine in your community? Driving drunk and high on cocaine is a death sentence in and of itself. The lack of respect for others on the road when you put yourself behind the wheel in that condition is unacceptable. Had the Bakers not been driving drunk and high on cocaine this never would have happened. You have to take responsibility for your actions. If you put yourself in a position like that, you never know how it will end up. He could have just as easily driven into a pole and killed himself. People who drink and do drugs and get into cars don't deserve any sympathy. Sorry! You're much safer now in this community with one more person off the road who could have easily killed one of your family members or one of mine!

Comment_arrow

Justice Forall

10:31 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Jason NO we don't want people drinking and doing drugs and we also don't want strangers following people and shooting and killing them!! It is crazy that you have no tolerance for DUI but you think it's ok to follow people and shoot and kill them?There are LAWS and POLICE to PROTECT us!! How stupid do you sound? I think if I had the choice to be beat up or shot to death I would chose the beating ESPECIALLY if I deserved it! WHO follows drunk drivers at 2 am and thinks they aren't going to be in a confrontation?? Now I need to be aware of Browning, Paul, and Jason!!! I wonder how many more of you there are? A bunch of pansies that don't have what it takes to be an officer so you think you can just drive around and uphold the law on your own grounds?

Justice Forall

10:14 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Hey Paul... If you think you are going to be vigilant and hunt someone down I would think you would have the brains to realize someone just may fight back! Do you really think you can go chasing people (especially at 2 am) and NOT expect trouble?? I would agree if you are sitting in your car and some random person reaches in to assault you, you would defend yourself but NOT if you instigate it!! I hope you teach your children or family members NOT to look for trouble because when you look for trouble you are bound to find it! You must be as stupid as the shooter~ if you want to save and protect be a cop and get the PROPER training on "how to" handle a situation. Crazy when mall cops can go prey on citizens~ Browning needs an attitude adjustment!! I hope he doesn't take his case too lightly and continue to hunt down, shoot, and kill DUI drivers!

Reply

Jason Defant

10:41 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Justice Forall - I take offense to you calling me a pansy. Who the hell are you? If you don't drive drunk and high on cocaine, you don't put yourself in a situation where you might end up dead. If there were cops out at 2am on the road to see this idiot driving drunk, people like Seth Browning wouldn't have to call 911 to report these idiots and try and get their license plate. You don't know all the facts, nor do I. So you can make whatever claims or assumptions you want. I will stand MY ground and say I am happy there are people like Seth Browning who care enough to get people who shouldn't be on the road OFF the road. What went down was clearly due to drinking and drugs. Period. And FYI, last thing I would want to be is a cop in Pinellas. The laziest bunch of clowns I've ever seen!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Minyard

12:47 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Jason don't worry. Not everyone that has been posting about this is an idiot. Just the people that side with the Bakers. The guy was high on coke and drunk. I will say it again The guy was high on coke and drunk and driving around. Justice you are just living in a different world. If I had seen this reckless drunk driving around I would have done the same thing and obviously the state attorney would also. Brandon got what he deserved! He got drunk and drugged up. Made his girlfriend cry then took off down the road again in a 2000 pound speeding bullet. Thankfully, Seth was there to stop him. Brandon then thought he was hard and a tough guy and attacked. Then he got put in the ground. Seth I hope you breath easier today! Oh and Bakers don't be scum and file a civil suit. You need to learn how to move on from this.

Comment_arrow

Dale

6:24 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Maybe he can shoot all the jaywalkers, stop sign runners, non turn signal users, texting drivers, non seat belt wearers and even the speeders. All of these also can be fatal and dangerous. The world we be a much safer place with wannabe cop Seth civilian patrol. Seth is not the judge!!! nor are you.

Michael Minyard

12:50 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Hey Nunya you are not very bright! He wasn't just drunk he was high on cocaine! which makes him a felon!!!! Whats scary is that there is people as ignorant as you in this community!

Reply

Mark

1:59 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Nobody is stating that Seth Browning didn't make any bad decision(s). But one can argue that Mr. Baker's bad decisions outweighed Seth's by far. Seth's bad decision was following Mr. Baker until a COMPLETE STOP was made by all parties. Mr Baker's bad decisions: driving all the way to a Hudson bar with the intent of excessively drinking (they originally went to the bar because they “knew the owner or bartender“ quotes directly from the Sister of Mr. Baker), potentially even driving to Hudson probably high on cocaine, drinking at least over 5 drinks at the bar, snorting cocaine, getting behind the wheel, after leaving the bar, deciding to be the ‘tough guy’ by suddenly stopping your vehicle to ‘give the business’ to the concerned citizen following you (who apparently you personally waived to follow….yet I personally don’t think that evidence given by Seth was credible)…keep in mind, Mr. Baker was already ‘heated’ from the recent argument with his girlfriend at 7Eleven and had knowledge his brother would be soon driving up on this situation, out numbering the citizen…..after throwing punches and being pepper sprayed, continuing with his attempt to punch and assault the citizen (which is the probable result of being on cocaine)……game over. If his drunken and high brother would have hit and injured a citizen attempting to drive home that same night, would you have a different opinion of the situation?

Reply

Michael Minyard

2:52 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

All you have to do is read this article. They realsed the states findings.

Reply

Michael Minyard

2:54 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

You shouldn't type things like that to people you don't know nunya. Not nice

Reply

Michael Minyard

2:56 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

And a coward Nunya, is someone that doesn't put there name on something they are commenting about!

Reply

Michael Minyard

3:39 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Ok you take care dear. Careful driving!! i guess you never know

Reply

Mark

3:52 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Those claims were made by Mr. Baker's sister on the previous articles comments (If I recall, she went as far to say that one of the three parties who knew the bartender or owner were attempting to get one of the other two individuals a job at the bar). This was her initial response when someone (potentially myself…I don’t recall….feel free to examine the previous comments from previous articles on the Patch) stated they were probably all drinking at the bar. Thus, her argument was they went to the bar to potentially get a job, rather than to drink. This perhaps could have been the case, yet them not drinking, we know now is simply false. The argument at 7 Eleven was either in the recent article itself or in the media coverage. It is sad and rather disappointing (at least CBS 11 o'clocks local news coverage), the media is attempting to make this unfortunate tragic incident, even more controversial, by intentionally limiting significant facts on the air last night. If I hadn't been following this case since day 1, and watched the news coverage of it last night, I would have been outraged by Seth's actions and perturbed about the final outcome made by the State. However, this couldn't be the furthest from my beliefs knowing the majority of the facts of evidence.

Reply

Mark

3:52 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

You simply can’t question Seth’s bad decision to follow Mr. Baker, without initially questioning one of numerous bad decisions that Mr. Baker initially made prior to even running into Seth on the road. And if I recall correctly, Seth did call the police, yet he did continue to follow Mr. Baker, in attempts to relay his license number to the cops.

Reply

Mark

4:05 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

It's disappointing and potentially only exhibits the individual's lack of being responsible for one's actions, for someone to continue to state, "But Seth shouldn't have followed a drunk driver and then shoot him". As mentioned above, if Mr. Baker didn't make numerous poor and ILLEGAL decisions prior, he would not have been in this unfortunate situation. And "War Hero" etc never came from these fingers. Yet, you are inaccurate for calling a 23 year old male, a child. That would make hundreds of thousands of children currently fighting in war for our country.

Reply

Mark

7:31 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

There is certainly an essence of truth regarding your last comment. However, we do not have close to the amount of character facts regarding Seth as a person, to provide such a premature statement, in reference to one bad decision he made.

Reply

Mark

8:43 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

First, If you read the prior comments, the information regarding Seth calling the cops prior, as he was following Mr. Baker, came from his own sister! Second, your previous comment is rather desperate and ridiculous. If anything, it appears the Browning party did just that, "shut their mouths" during the investigation process, rather than throwing unnecessary stones at people conducting the investigation and developing (what turned out to be) accurate opinions of the case on all the message boards involving the case.

Reply

Mark

9:32 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

If you clearly read my initial comments on the most recent articles on this site, you would be aware of my general identity of this case. Of course I haven't conducted a formal investigation of this case. All of my statements are devised based upon the information released by the media, police reports, personal accounts of the Baker family and now personal accounts from Mr. Browning and/or his attorney. In addition, you should be aware of my initial claim stating that, "I get it" in regards to the family wanting to protect their loved one's name. It is only the Baker supporters that are making claims of Seth's character, outside of his judgment made during the incident. It is my opinion that once you begin to analyze a party's past character and actions, it is perceived to be a rather desperate act to seek such negative traits of that party (which has absolutely nothing to do with the case) and generally it only further discredits the people making the personal accusations, along with the party they are attempting to protect or “make look better”. At no time have I attempted to “dig up” dirt on Mr. Baker.

Reply

Mark

9:32 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

. Rather, I have focused on the events of that particular night. In addition, if I were you, I would move with caution, in regards to seeking Mr. Browning’s past issues. You then simply set yourself up for opening a ‘can of worms’ regarding Mr. Baker’s past issues. I’m assuming that your attempting to claim that Seth is a hypocrite, at best, due to his past driving record and his decision to follow Mr. Baker, due to his erratic driving skills that particular night. That would be a fair statement, yet irrelevant to the legalities of the case. However, I’ve never been interested in dealing with that sort of mess, as it is simply not pertinent to the case at hand.

Reply

Mark

9:35 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

One last thing......please expand on your statement referencing that I was, "Passing judgement on people from info fed by the media".....?? That is inaccurate and the furthest from being remotely true.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

6:03 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I would support making DUI a capital crime. But it has to be for everyone not just who Seth chooses. It also needs carried out by a judicial system. Mark I am interested on your opinion of the 2 freinds fighting and 1 gets shot and killed. No charges. Do you really want a society where he who shoots first wins?

Dale

6:15 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

We will never know the whole story as 1 person is dead and only they know the other side. Seth changed his story too. Forgetting to put car in park? maybe. But maybe he rearended Brandon before he stopped and that is why Brandon stopped. They did not investigate Seth very well. They did not confirm his whereabouts after work. They also did not do a toxicology or feild sobriety check on Seth. What may he have been on. I don't know. i think he was a wannabe cop as he stated in the 911 tape. Getting ready to join the academy. Why did he tell dispatchers he was an off duty security guard? Does that matter? It is a bad law that needs a little revision.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

7:04 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I agree with you Dale that it appears they failed to do a thorough investigation on Seth's 'intake's' from that night. Yet, we can only unfortunately speak upon the facts of the evidence.....There are numerous 'could ofs and should ofs' that don't occur in all investigations in general. We must speak upon the controlling aspects of the case. I totally disagree with you referring to not knowing if Seth intentionally ran into Brandon, resulting in Brandon stopping and jumping out of his truck. It is quite clear from the evidence on the scene and the statements of the other two parties your particular accused "collision" did not occur in that manner. Regarding the phone call.....nobody can predict what they would do or say after protecting one self with a gun. I will say though, that Seth's words to the operator appears to be selfish and are befuddling. Yet, it's difficult to judge someone in that situation, as I previously just mentioned. Dale, I'm unsure of what you want my opinion of exactly, regarding 2 people fighting?

BILLY THE KID

6:22 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

The most dangerous people on the road are Drug Dealers taking Drugs. The character and reputation of an individual and their past speaks volumes. When you are dealing drugs to the population you are not a kind gentle person. Are people just plain delusional or blind to the fact of the brothers activity for years ? This is an action/re-action situation and with unfortunate results - but how many lives are taken or destroyed by Drug Dealers ?

Reply

JAZZ MAN

6:26 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

BTK - Your comments are accurate and anyone who knows them can tell you much more about there dealings and past actions with violence included. They also have guns just didn't have with them this time.

Reply

Dale

6:35 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Again I would support dealing drugs as a capital crime. Enforced by the law and the judicial system.

Reply

JAZZ MAN

6:53 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

nunya - you got it and Dale I do understand the loss here is greater than what it should be, but for years actions dodged these deadly events. Sorry for this entire situation especially the Baker family, but again both parties have to accept responsibility on their actions. I am sure knowing the outcomes they both would have altered their decisions. It's just hard to do that when you are drinking/drugging.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

7:45 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Jazzman - I am family. There is definitly responsibility on both sides. But vigilante justice is doomed to failure. It should be comdemned and illegal.

BILLY THE KID

6:56 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

nunya you hit the nail on the head

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

7:46 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Billy. It takes drug users to make drug dealers. Sound like you are part of the problem.

Dale

7:41 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Mark this is the story I am refering
http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/bn9/2012/9/26/exclusive_mom_wants_.html
hope that link works.Regarding the car contact. The only 2 who knows if there was contact is Brandon and Seth. A car following behing them may not notice light contact. Physical evidence would be the same.

Reply

BILLY THE KID

7:54 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

So you will blame the addicts and say they are worse than the dealer ? - Doctors today are dealers. I never took a drug in my life and rarely drink - what I am telling you is that I am aware of things over the years on a first hand basis. Don't kill the messenger. It seems like you understand what I am saying, but would like to dis-credit me to invalidate what I am saying. That's your deal - but I know what I state and know first hand. If what you say is correct the only one who knows drug dealers are the users. How about family members of the users who almost die from the dealers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

7:58 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

i thought your post said you bought drugs from him? sorry If that is not the case.

Dale

7:56 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

One story had seth hitting brandons truck because he was blocked in. The other was that he forgot to put it in park. The 2 stories leads me to think it was something else. Just trying to make some sense out of a total mess.

Reply

BILLY THE KID

8:05 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I am related to some of the users and their connections over the past years. I was an innocent victim like the Baker family to the actions of a Drug Dealer - I say both the User and the Dealer are accountable. The Dealer preys on the weakness of his users. Dealers usually are not users.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

8:09 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I agree to a point. Don't blame mcd's for being fat. don't blame tobacco co's for smoking. Don't blame guns for killing people. People have to take responsibilty for their own actions!

Comment_arrow

Vito Corleone

2:45 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Chris is lucky I wasn't there. Browning was in the Army. I was a Marine, I would have shot both brothers.

Comment_arrow

Dale

12:22 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Vito - tuff guy huh?
Disgrace to the military is what you are!
I thought the military trained you to protect yourself without a gun.

Comment_arrow

Mark

11:11 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Confused...why post this link again...just wondering

The_Way_I-See-It

9:47 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I have not stated my association before that I remember but I will now, I am a resident of the property Seth used to work on and I aslo have a son that went to school with the Bakers he is only a few years older. Seth was highly respected for his work ethic in my community and I have yet to hear a person that lives here express any thoughts that he was a "triggerhappy" individual and that's from people that knew him everyday. I also like to point out the fact that he used a entire pepper spray can until it was empty in attempt to deter these ATTACKERS yes that is plural. I have had exteme interest in this case since day 1 and I see a few others are here with me like Jazz and Mark. I have been waiting so patiently until I could obtain the memo from the state attorney to make comments and now I have it. I stated attackers as plural and have evidence to support! No one can deny now cause I have facts, not quotes from media article but facts. This article we are commenting on comes close but still leaves few minor details out. FOLLOW MY NEXT POST

Reply

Dale

10:09 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

This is going to be good. Facts from someone who was not there.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

10:12 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I am going to point out a few key facts that most people might have read over and missed or not put thought into. It states that durring Seth and Baker had contact with each other while driving on East Lake road, it explains that Baker passed Seth driving erratically and Seth pulled up next to him TO SEE IF HE WAS ALRIGHT. (This shows that this man had concern for his well being, that's not tailgating or being aggressive) it continues on to say that Brandon GAVE A "THUMBS UP" which Seth interpreted as FOLLOW ME. Now we have something for a open disscussion: reasonably we can say that if he thought Brandon WANTED him to follow then it would be considering that he was aware a confintation was going to occur, which seth stated. CIS officer(not gaurds) are trained to obtain all vehicle information so I'm sure he did that for procaution, which would explain y 911 was not called at that time and the fact that the gun was "IN THE GLOVEBOX" ALSO SHOWS HE HAD NO REASON TO BELIEVE HE WAS ENTERING A BAD SITUATION cause he didn't have it in a defensive place. So with that being said there might not have been any reason there was anything wrong with turning down that road. That might be y he was not charged.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roderick

11:55 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012

Why would anyone follow someone who was driving erratically?
Why would anyone pull next to someone driving erratically and risk being in an accident?

Nothing that Seth Browning did that night makes common sense.

Dale

10:20 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Here is a fact for you! Nobody needed to die that night! No matter wha the evil Baker twins did or your angel Seth Browning. I don't know if you know this but good people make mistakes. Good young firefighters sometimes turn to setting fires. It happens all the time. Same thing happens to young law enforcement prospects. I can't explain why they do it! Seth made a mistake by pursuing Brandon. No he does not deserve to die for it. But he needs to know that this was a mistake and he has some of the responsibilty of this night!

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

10:21 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Next I will point out another key point made that Chris and Amy CHANGED THEIR STATEMENTS MULTIPLE TIMES. From their website to their SWORN statements. I see on here that someone claimed Seth changed his but that is not true, NO WHERE HAS SETH EVER GIVEN A STATEMENT EXCEPT TO POLICE. 10 news only directly quoted him saying he didn't want it to be a back and forth game. He has never talked bad about these people like they have done him or spoke at all, that is confirmed from the letter his own lawyer released which is in quotes. So the only known lier is the Bakers. anyone care to debate these facts then look above

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

10:29 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Dale ur opinion is based on emotion and I can respect that but Seth was doing the right thing. Drunk drivers kill people everyday, coke heads do worse. If u condone those actions just cause "he was a good guy" then here is ur proof he wasn't such a "good guy" after all. Whether u like it or not HE HAD NO REASON TO ATTACK THAT BOY. HIS BROTHER HAD NO RIGHT TO JOIN IN. SRY FOR UR LOSS, CASE CLOSED

Reply

Dale

10:36 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Brownings 911 tape did not state this. He said that brandon ran him off the road.
Here is another problem. He did not have time to put his car in park but he could get his pepper spray and gun out of the glovebox.
You need to learn what a fact is!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The state attorney even recognized that Seth changed his story. They did not have enough evidence to charge him due to no credible sober witnesses.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

10:40 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Security might not be law enforcement but its still in the job line of "public service" just like a lw enforcement officer. Security is there to protect us also and have training to do it(I don't know how much but I know they go to a school). I think the fact that he didn't have to swear he would do his job shows good integrity, its not like he tried to arrest him like a cop he has reporting it. The bad decitions are apparent, its never a good idea to do anything for a stranger in my opinion but people do it all the time like giving rides to walkers. It still doesn't mean that getting a "beating" was deserved. That decition was the worst. Don't blame Seth for what he did cause it was only in reaction to what Brandon did

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

10:54 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Security is private service not public. Seths 911 tape stated he was starting the police academy. It is all about reactions. If you really think Seth gave Brandon a thumbs up and not the finger or something way worse you are delusional. I am sure brandoned returned it. And it went back and forth till Seth shot him. If you think Seth has no responsibility for this act you have a serious problem.

Dale

10:46 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I do not condone drunk driving. But I don't drive around killing people because of it. You are a moron!!! I have more than once reported a drunk driver. I did not need to follow them off my regular course or get their license plate number. It is easy. i actually have a radio and can talk directly to dispatch or use a phone.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

10:49 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Sober witness being a solid statement sir, it goes to show what bad comes of drinking and driving, it also states ON THE MEMO FROM THE STATE ATTORNEY WHAICH IS CONFIRMED BY FACTS, that Seth stated this under disstress, either way his story provided on record was supported. It describes the evidence to prove his story that HE HAD BRUISES ON HIS CHIN AND ARM, THE SPRAY RESIDUE IN THE CAR PROVES HE WAS SPRAYED WHILE IN THE CAR AND NOT FROM FEET AWAY LIKE CHRIS SAID. It also stated that the bullet casing was found inside the vehicle which meant it was fired inside the car, not out the window

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

10:54 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

U don't need to call me names, ur aggrivation over a conversation shows that u are quite unable to have a intelegant discussion with someone. I have a question for u, y do u have a radio to talk to a police dispatch? Are u a cop? Who's playing cop now. Also it is obvious u don't read much, I stated and I state again, it was made clear that his decision to follow was in a belief that he was requested to follow, I don't see a problem with that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

11:08 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Not a cop. Firefighter/EMT

Dale

11:06 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

This is my last post to you as you cannot even understand what i am trying to say. Do you ever hear me say that Brandon did nothing wrong? NO! All I want you to understand is that Seth did not do everything right. He did not follow Brandon because he waved to him and you know it! He wanted to get him arrested at least. He should have called the police gave them the vehicle description and that he pulled into the apt complex and went on his merry way. Everybody lived maybe Brandon gets arrested. That is it. I wonder how much tax money this used trying to investigate this.

Reply

Mark

11:06 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Throwing stones, are we Dale? Well these two comments I directly copied from Brandi Baker's previous comments and pasted for you to see, when I made a valid assumption the parties were potentially intoxicated:

"They werent parting that will be show from the medical examiner"

"Wow really now your claiming my brothers on drugs. Keep sinking lower makes you look like more of an idiot."

Who's the moron now? Enough said,,,,,,,,

Reply
Comment_arrow

brandi baker

11:52 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

How was I supposed to know they were on drugs. I wasn't there. I was wrong. I don't think that makes us morons.

Dale

11:07 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I never said it. I have no idea.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

11:10 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Security is a private field of public service. A trained person to be the first responder in absence of law enforcement. I find it hard to believe that Seth was able to make up such a story that was supported by PHYSICAL EVIDENCE so quickly. I know that I'm wasting my time trying to convince u but I am having fun making ur agruments into a laugh. I have a masters degree sir I am far from a moron

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

11:12 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I have seen many Masters degreed people that are morons.

Dale

11:11 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I get upset when this person claims to have fact. They do not even understand what a fact is. OJ was proven innocent of killing his wife. Does that make it a fact?

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

11:16 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Dale I had no idea u were a firefighter sir, I. Thank u for what u do as a occupation but dissagree with ur reasoning/logic. Its not that hard to believe cause I know Seth isn't what people say he is. I'm sure he feels some guilt for his decition to follow and that might explain his silence I don't know I havnt seen him since the day b4 this occured

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

11:20 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Yes and I am not one of those idiots.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

11:52 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I do not agree with your logic. You are also blinded by your relatioship with Seth. I had a young firefighter that I would have supported in anything. Thought the world of this young man. He made a mistake and I had to have him arrested. It is something hero related. I do not understand it but it happens very often in the fire service. I apologize for the name calling. You are simply misguided in my opinion. Just remember this. If you would take Seth out of that situation Brandon would still be alive and if you took Brandon out of the situation Seth would not have killed anyone. Takes 2 to tango my friend. I am out of here for good. Good luck to you!!

The_Way_I-See-It

11:22 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

This isn't the OJ trial, they didn't have enough evidence to convict him anyway. This has evidence which is defined as facts. Not to meantion no one in this case is a millionare to buy their way out

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

11:39 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

Same exact thing applies here. They did not have enough evidence to overturn SYG. Before SYG Seth would have been arrested and went to trial like OJ.Then a jury would have decided what they determined to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Not that any of it is fact. Legality has nothing to do with what my argument is. As a trained security guard he should use better judgement.

I am also a degreed Mechanical Engineer
a NRA member
a strong supporter in a persons right to defend himself

The_Way_I-See-It

1:42 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

it is very wise to state that without one the other would not have happend cause that is true in every situation. I do realise that at the end of this we will just have to agree to disagree and know that we both argued our opinions to the end. I don't believe myself to be blinded by a "relationship" with Seth because we are not friends, he simply worked my neighborhood, but hearing the stories and reading the articles just interested me because I never knew someone in a situation like this but I drew a conclusion on day 1, followed this to the end and now have the FACTS from the evidence. On the same note ur just as blind as I am by ur relationship to Brandon.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

1:52 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

With that being stated I also want to say that I also accepted in my mind that "if" things were flipped and Seth was charged for not being honest, etc. I would have still taken side with what evidence proved him guilty. I have to point out also that Stand Your Ground was MEANTIONED in the memo but ultimatly its still Castle Doctrine. He never left his vehicle, had the 2 been wanting to fight they both would have stopped and jumped out fighting, Seth stated and was able to prove he was unaware of instigating anything. I read comments that he was a "vigilanty" and looking for trouble, that is obserd and totally illogical, that is a ignorant persons way of rationalising a situation in their mind, this isn't batman. He was a conserned person.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

2:08 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

You said u support the NRA, u carry and have reported people in the past. Put urself in this same situation, u see a person driving erratically(keeping in mind u are trained to identify signs of intoxicated driving.) The u begin to collect vehicle data; color, make, model, distinguishing features(rims, body kit) and if possible driver discription. For senario purpose say it takes u 40 seconds to gather this, how far have u traveled when going 50 down East Lake. Then the person notices, stops quickly and then runs up on ur car. Doesn't do like chris claimed and asks u why ur following him. He does what THE EVIDENCE STATED and begins hitting u while ur stuck in ur car and caught off gaurd. Is he armed? U don't know. Then joined by a second person who has blocked your rear escape and they are at ur vehicle also. Is he armed? You don't know. What do u do sir? I said shoot.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

2:17 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Its hard to accept cause ur friends with Brandon but I just have to say I agree with his reasoning in what he did. Some people say roll up ur window, I have power windows and they don't roll up very fast, also a window is just glass, a man of his strengh and adrinaline would easily punch through. I don't question that. Could he have drove away, evidence supports "no" so ill go with that if it said, yes he could have ran Brandon over then we would still have this outcry because he hit a man with a car and that could just as well of killed him. I'm going to state one more thing too. I don't think the family can sue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda W

12:07 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

TWISI- You keep spouting off with "evidence supports". It makes you sound really stupid when evidence doesn't really support. I measured the car distance btw. It was over 70 feet. What evidence did you actually see to support that Seth couldn't drive away?

Comment_arrow

Dale

11:33 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

I had to respond to yet another misguided statement from TWISI. Can you roll up your window faster and easier than getting a gun and pepper spray out of the glovebox? Also as a firefighter for over 20 years I know how tuff car windows are. They are tempered glass and mike tyson could punch them all day and do nothing but break his hand. You have watched to much tv. As for sueing I am not personally sure myself. Unless your masters is in law I will have to take the families lawyers (who consulted state attorney"s office) opinion over yours. I think the big difference in civil case is who is gathering and presenting the evidence. The lawyers and their investigators will investigate Seth's stories completely. Maybe you can be a character witness for your model citizen Seth.

The_Way_I-See-It

1:59 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

Well Nunya I didn't realise I was being graded on my spelling and grammer, I posted comments to point out facts of a article not get a passing grade. U must be the person who spell checks txt messages right?. I'm don't know how old u are but I am 52 years old and I was talking. If insults are all u have as a defense on this topic then it means iv won this debate. As for ur inbox being full maybe u should just unsubscribe because clearly u lack intelligence and u should consult with ur parents before accessing the internet. Be careful out there special boy

Reply

Vito Corleone

3:04 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Hey Nunya, fate attenzione che vi scopare con. spell that

Reply

Linda W

12:02 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

I don't have time now to read ALL these posts, but wow. Nice to see you, Mark. Much respect to you, but I still think this case should go to jury. FIrst of all, none of you know what this "fight with Amy" was about. Maybe SHE was upset because he called her stupid for ..., and he was laughing about it. Maybe HE wasn't angry at all, she was. I absolutely believe as CC does, that this does not add up. The time line for Browning is all wrong, and he changed his story. He says Brandon waved him over, but he says he was following an erratic driver. He followed a LONG way, and he had been out of work for a LONG time. I believe completely that he knows the SYG law and he worked it. He wraps himself in the American flag. A patriot would know the Constitution. Our Constition does not promote vigilantism or murder. Another issue I have is that Seth wasn't injured. Brandon was a big guy, but he didn't physically hurt Seth with all those punches? C'mon. Also, Brandon had coke in his system -did Seth? Ummm, did anyone test the shooter? I would like to know if HE was tested? His 911 call really bothers me, as CC stated. He was so concerned about himself, and his future. He didn't seem distraught in the least that he actually took a life. Running into a wannabe like Browning on patrol appears to be a death sentence.... legally. I think he is a person we all need to fear.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

9:16 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Howdy Linda.....Question....Why does it matter about the reason Brandon was in an argument with his girl? What is obvious, is they were MOST PROBABLY arguing about something, due to her not willing to drive with him. Don't quote me on this, but I can't recall if she got into his brother's car while at 7 Eleven or she did so from the bar. Going out on a limb here, but is it possible she didnt want to drive with him due to him being too intoxicated to drive? I dunno, but any argument would favor Seth's legal party anyways. Please show me where Seth changed his story that would be pertinent to the case? He did NOT follow him a long way also. Seth was 'injured', yet not severely injured. Yet, it doesn't legally matter in terms of that. That simply shows Brandon's initial intent to be aggressive. It is impossible for Seth to suddenly calculate how bad he may or may have not been injured before protecting himself. One more note....Seth didn't follow him to his apt.......you know that Linda...lol

Linda W

2:47 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

nunya commented that I may have threatened with my last post, and we should possibly involve authorities. The post was deleted. Please let me clear that up. I, in no way, threaten anyone, or anything. I just truly believe that this was a senseless murder that didn't have to happen, and should not have happened. I believe we have the right to have it go before a jury, as per the Constitution. If a jury of 12 men and women stated that Browning had the right to go on patrol without a badge, and follow Brandon to his house, then murder him and claim self-defense, I would accept it. I would not have to like it, but I would accept that the Judicial System is set in place, followed, and working as best it can.

Reply

Dale

11:59 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012

For Mark. You never commented on the other SYG article I posted a link to. Nothing will bring Brandon back! I am trying to focus my effort more on fixing the SYG type laws. It almost seems like if 2 people are alone or no witnesses that murder is OK. Question for you. If Chris had a gun, and in fear for his life, then shot Seth after his brother was shot would you also be in favor of him being set free on SyG laws?

Things that I would like to see changed:
Pursuit or instigation.- Needs to go to court and have all sides presented to a jury. We have to stop untrained people from enforcing the law.
Mandatory drug and alcohol testing for shooter.- Discharging a firearm on another human being should be at least as important as driving a car. Should be part on consent during application for concealed carry permit. Zero tolerance on this.
No witnesses- Not sure but I think it should go to trial if it is not blatently clear. I do not want politicians deciding the case. I would rather have a jury.

any thoughts?

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

2:53 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Linda I've been to the scene as well, you can argue till your blue in the face or your finger tips on the keyboard begin to hurt that "he could have drove away" but the Memo from the State Attorney states "HE HAD NO ABILITY TO LEAVE" whether you have 70ft or not I believe its hard to drive away with a man hitting you. IT STATED THAT HE HAD MARKS ON HIS ARM AND CHIN, FACT. You have a habit of not reading very well but its ok cause I don’t mind pointing it out again. Also it seems everyone has developed this new theory of Seth rolling up a window and grabbing his pepper spray. AGAIN it states in the Memo that Seth pepper sprayed Brandon in reaction to being hit, which means Brandon had already stuck his body in the window. NO WINDOW WILL ROLL UP IF THERE IS A PERSON THERE. He got the pepper spray afterwards, used the entire can trying to spray Chris in defense and THEN pulled the gun as his LAST resort. Window theory disproved. Another new one is Linda presuming Seth to be on drugs also. Are you serious, that is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. He was at work and then the gym, not a bar. Don’t be rediculous and how do you know he wasn’t drug tested.

Reply

The_Way_I-See-It

3:08 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Another ridiculous thing I hear is “he followed him a long way” by now everyone should know he worked in Lansbrook Village Condo’s by Ridgemoor and East Lake. That’s a bit over 3 miles and depending on when this actually unfolded, if you drive down East Lake at 50mph they were only able to communicate for a very short time. This case was investigated by a whole team of forensics, detectives and lawyers. Not just one person. SYG would not have protected the Bakers in this case at all in any way. Seth never got out of the vehicle so if he were shot in his car your boy would have been canned. If Chris even owned a gun he would still go to jail cause he is a convicted Felon. Any argument you have is disproved by physical evidence and supports Seth. Open your eyes this guy attacked a man. I hope none of us have to be in this situation but in this case I call it how it is, cokehead rageaholic got what he had coming. Goodnight everybody see you on the next controversial topic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

7:52 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Seth never got out of his vehicle? This quote is copied from the above article!
"Seth Browning stated he stepped out of his car in a defensive stance after the shooting, and when he did so, he forgot his car was in drive, and it rolled forward, striking the back of Brandon Baker's truck."

Jim Kerns

4:17 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012

This guy was 30 years old and coking up like an idiot kid. All you people baww about how Seth Browning should have called the police - if Brandon Baker was so butthurt or "threatened" (and have you seen pictures of this guy? he was obviously a huge thug) about being followed to his apartment complex - AFTER his brother pulled in after Browning and blocked him from escaping anywhere (see the other recent article on this site about this) - HE should've called the cops. Even if Browning chose to leave, his car would've still been trapped there and he would've been found.

But that's not what Brandon Baker did. Instead, he _CHOSE_ to go up to Browning's car - who followed him there out of concern, _because he thought Baker had motioned for him to do so!_ - and began to attack him. He _continued_ to attack him after being pepper sprayed. These two stupid, thuggish choices got him shot.

Frankly, I think anybody defending this guy is probably a closet thug themselves, and is realizing the time where they can get away with their behavior of terrorizing other people is rapidly coming to an end. This is a good thing. Bravo to the Seth Brownings of the world, and bravo to Florida's self-defense laws that favor law-abiding citizens over drugged-up thugs. This is the way it should be, everywhere.

Reply

Mark

11:53 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Dale, I haven't taken a look at that site yet.....I will though in the near future....been down and out with the flu for the pass several days......Linda, nice to see your back. Brandi, if you did not know he was or wasn't intoxicated on alcohol and/or drugs then stating you didn't know would have been just fine or silence, which I've heard is golden. It is a reasonable assumption, that when individuals go to a bar, until near closing time, that consumption was taking place in some manner. Two things that disturb me regarding Seth statements are 1. When he claims that Brandon waived at him, he understood that as to follow him....I think that is BS.....It just doesn't make any sense. I doubt that occurred, yet even if it didn't happen, it is my belief the same results occur. 2. Seth's initial phone call to the dispatchers....in which I've already expressed my feelings of in previous comments.....just plain selfish. However, both of these disturbing acts don't affect the legalities of the case. Was Seth potentially concerned about Brandon's driving? Perhaps....Was Seth attempting to also be the tough guy from a rent a cop stand point? Perhaps....Was Seth shocked and did he potentially underestimate the actions of a highly intoxicated individual? Perhaps..But this again people..DOESN'T MATTER LEGALLY. Which is what I have been attempting to preach all along. I do believe they slipped by not screening Seth, but apparently he was not impaired by law enforcement standards to do so.

Reply

Supporter

5:26 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Look I've known Seth for four years bottoms line is simply this, these idiots who try to say Seth is a murderer are plain stupid, UNLESS YOU WERE THERE YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED, so stop talking like you we're there. Everyone is saying that baker was " a wonderful person and wouldn't hurt anyone" hhmm I'm ire Seth chin an the guy that the baker brothers beat so badly he had to be hospitalized would disagree with that. Thug meets cop tried to be a hard ass and lost bottom line

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

5:40 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Browning and Zimmerman, for that matter, are not cops! Wish it was a cop that pulled up behind him. He would still be alive. Maybe in jail but alive.

Comment_arrow

Linda W

7:59 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

What a ridiculous thing to say. The day Seth Browning becomes a real cop, we are all in trouble. Many people have lost respect for LEOs because men with Seth Browning's mentality slip by and become cops. Their attitude is generally, "I AM the law". It's too bad this entire younger generation doesn't know what it was like when we taught our children to go find an officer if/when threatened or scared. Parents teach their children to stay away from cops today. That is SOOOO sad to me.

Comment_arrow

Mark

10:44 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Linda......your killing me as usual...lol....I'm unsure of what parents would sway their children not to seek law enforcement if need be. The only plausible situation would be the gang mentality factor, in relation to not wanting to 'snitch' for fear of retaliation purposes. And your chosen words of 'mentality slip' befuddles me....please clarify. Thanks and hope your doing well.

Mark

9:02 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

I've attempted not to discredit any parties character when unprovoked to do so. Yet it is bothersome when Seth's character is scrutinized initially. I don't know either parties, yet I would be willing to bet both parties have 'wrap sheets' of some sort, with Seth's potentially being less 'severe', due to his job and future and/or past intent to serve our country (do not recall). Put it this way, the worse comment from thousands of comments I've read regarding Seth's character, is that he was a "hot rodder". I wont even mention the worse I've heard of the Baker boys character...'point taken?'....... Regardless, Dale is correct, even though we have complete different opinions of the unfortunate situation, I too, wish an actual cop would have pulled up behind Mr. Baker. He may have then suffered consequences by the law, yet he would be here today for his family to love. Question to Dale......Do you think your relationship with Brandon, affects your opinion of the incident? Just curious, because I understand your advocating for different issues regarding the situation etc. To be honest, I'm shocked that any non-bias individual knowing the facts of the case would have any different of a legal opinion than the State provided. I fully comprehend this is an immature statement at best...lol...but I just don't really see an argument here....but that's what makes America....America.....I guess......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

10:10 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Mark I am sure I have some biases. But no more than any of the Seths supporters on here. If I was using to same logic as TWISI brandon has never been convicted of being a drug dealer, that I know of, so the fact would be that he is not. The legal issue isn't my biggest worry. I don't agree with the law. I think it was the pursuit that complicated this situation to the lethal level. It would very easy for me to take the law into my own hands in many situations. I was recently robbed. I know who did it. Police done nothing. Haven't even called me back. Should I go after the guys? Not my place. The florida conceal carry group basically teaches how to shoot someone and get away with it. They have specific instructions and even a card to hand to the police so they do not have to talk. They advocate taking the law into your own hands. They will fight any changes to this law to the death of it. don't hear to much about these incidents in the other states that have this law. Why is Florida so bad? Innocent people are going to die from this law being applied. I think seth was well versed in the self defense laws. I also believe he had his gun and spray at the ready. I also believe that he wanted to use them. Can I prove it? No

Dale

10:24 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

These self defense laws and guns will enbolden a person to push the limits further than they would have without them. We need to keep them in check. I studied the laws quite well and advised my family that if there were any evidence that Brandon was inside seths car that he would probably not be charged. I don't agree with the force felony part of that either. Maybe a misdomeaner for punching someone but not a felony. I have seen forced felonies at the daytona 500. They going to charge Tony Stewert for punching Kurt Busch. Should give him a medal. Punching someone should not be a felony.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

10:31 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Even better> What if Kurt Busch whipped out a gun from his car and shot Tony Stewert on national TV. He then does not get arrested. Races the rest of the season and 6 months later the state attorney states that the was a justifiable use of self defense due to the forced felony and no chrges will be filed. This would probably start a civil war.

Paul Allen

6:13 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Maybe people shouldn't go around assaulting other people if they don't want to get shot!

Reply

Mark

10:37 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Dale, I give you credit for taking the initiative on your beliefs. I would be fooling myself if I were to claim knowing the different FL laws in relation to your efforts. Yet, I admire your drive and dedication to fight for your strong beliefs. Regarding Seth leaving his vehicle, I'm fairly confident this particular action by Seth was only pertinent if he exited his car prior to Brandon's aggressive behaviors. In addition, it is my opinion Seth was simply what everyone has previous stated, in a 'rent-a-cop' mode of sorts. It is also my belief, we are given Seth more credit for his knowledge of the Fl conceal and carry laws than led to believe. As far as Mr. Baker's track record.....no comment.....I don't think it is relevant, but I have my opinions of his character and I will just leave it at that. The same goes for Seth. Dale I was befuddled when you stated the 'law isn't your biggest worry'? One last note, forensics have shown that Brandon was being aggressive towards Seth, while Seth was in the seat of his car.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale

10:52 pm on Monday, October 1, 2012

Mark, What I was trying to say is whether Seth goes to jail or not will not bring Brandon back or prevent this from happening to anyone else. I would like to change the law instead. Prevent the pursuit. Reaching in a car and punching someone should not be a forced felony. etc...

Dale

10:00 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Mark, Hope you are feeling better.
Lets take all stories from either side out of it and look at physiclal evidence. What evidence supports brandon was in car? No finger prints inside the car. Anything on the door is suspect. Door could be open or closed. Stiil no prints on inside of door. Smudge on door went down and toward rear of car. Pepper spray inside car. Doesn't tell us a lot. Shell casing in car. Still not real definative. Door could have been opened. Could have been completely outside car and shell ejected out of gun back into car. I think I could duplicate all of these showing the possibility that Brandon was not in car. Hopefully we can find another witness that saw Seth out of the car before the shooting. Pretty sure there is going to be a civil suit against Seth and CIS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

12:27 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Dale I support your enthusiasm regarding this case. Without taking the time to review all the evidence (cuz it's past my bedtime), If I recall, the shape, length, density, patterns etc. of the blood splatter, would be the 'proof in the pudding' in relation to the door being closed. In addition, I'm fairly certain (could be wrong), Chris's statements were consistent with the door being closed prior to the gunshot.

Comment_arrow

Mark

12:33 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

When you say "in car", I take that you mean any part of Brandon's body or limbs? If the case, it was clear due to the minor injuries on Seth's face. And again, the statements of the other parties involved reporting Seth's window was down and Brandon was verbally arguing and attempting to physically assault Seth while he remained in his vehicle with the window up.

Comment_arrow

Mark

12:33 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

***Window Down...obviously****

Dale

10:07 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

I got this quote off CIS website.
"CIS officers also receive training in unarmed defensive tactics...including the most important unarmed technique of all: Conflict De-escalation!"
Seth may have been absent that day.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

12:20 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Dale, I couldn't agree with you more, in relation to the importance of de-escalation tactics. I'm not in law enforcement, yet I work closely in relation to performing such specific techniques, on a daily basis. However, it's difficult to participate in de-escalation techniques if quickly rushed upon in an aggressive manner (punches).

topman

2:19 am on Friday, November 30, 2012

I agree that Browning acted in self defense, however people should be less harsh on the Baker family because they still lost a love one.

Reply

Leave a comment